THE QUEEN’S ENGLISH


  It is a tradition in our family to try and listen to the Queen’s Christmas speech.  We are all committed royalists at heart. British royalty, anyway; and any of the others that behave in a truly royal manner and are not mere leeches.

  That doesn’t stop me from being critical.   If the Queen wrote her own speech as she usually does, she should have spotted that trap in ‘the angels came down to frightened shepherds’ and either changed the word order or made darn sure that the ‘-ed’ was produced with extra-clear elocution.  For a startled minute, I did wonder why the angels were said to have been frightening the poor shepherds.

  Also, I wondered what ‘orphan’ she was on about, but it appears to be her pronunciation of the word ‘often’. Has she always done that, and I’ve only just noticed?

  Anyway, I found it significant that her message was uncompromisingly Christian. I am in favour of that, but of course it will add fuel to the fires of the squealing minority who feel it is insulting to them for the predominating religion or customs of a country to be stressed.

  My own ideas on that are the same as those which prevailed when we chose, as non-Catholics, to send our daughters to Catholic schools.   In return for the excellence of the education, we expected the girls to conform to the customs and practices they would find there. It was up to them to decide whether to do so out of politeness, or to become committed themselves. It was not up to them to criticise.

         © Colonialist December 2011 (Letterdash/WordPress)

About colonialist

Active septic geranium who plays with words writing fantasy novels and professionally editing, with notes writing classical music, and with riding a mountain bike, horses and dinghies. Recently Indie Publishing has been added to this list.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to THE QUEEN’S ENGLISH

  1. colonialist says:

    I was, of course, brought up to believe that such elocution was correct and desirable towards proper understanding. I still find it infinitely preferable to the slurred and lazy noises that pass for speech amongst a significant proportion of the population.

    Like

  2. adeeyoyo says:

    I used to listen as a child, Col. But that over elecuted (nearly said electrocuted) squeak put me off.

    Like

  3. What a treat to find a commentary on the Queen’s Speech from across the world, Col! I’m going to listen to it again, just to catch the frightened shepherds and the orphans.

    Like

You have the right to remain silent - but please don't!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s