Here is a Reblog from my writing, composing and editing site:
Most writers tend to want their editors to remain, if not invisible, at least fairly well-hidden. Some, but not all, do give an acknowledgement in the front matter. Some don’t. They want it to be assumed that no hand has muddied the pristine waters of their genius.
If authors do mention that their book is in the course of being edited, they hardly ever say by whom, so unless they do the editor is also obliged to keep mum on the subject.
Also, the editor has to be aware of the confidentiality of the relationship. If it is known what books are being worked on, any general remarks on writing faults may be assumed as having arisen from the current project.
It is refreshing, therefore, that I have received full permission from the multi-talented Mart Sander (link is to the Wiki page on him) to blog my appraisal of his latest novel, now undergoing an edit of the final section. He may, of course, have been influenced by the fact that it isn’t exactly uncomplimentary! 🙂
The Goddess of the Devil
by
Mart Sander
Editor’s Appraisal
Few novels I have edited – or, indeed, read – have gripped my attention and imagination to the extent this one has succeeded in doing. The main protagonist, Maria Orsic (Orschitsch), actually existed and was an exceptionally beautiful woman, with blonde hair to her ankles, whose mediumistic talents were acknowledged even by sceptics. Her association with the famous and the infamous of the Nazi era, and the influence of her ‘Vril’ group of clairvoyants and mediums upon them, had an undoubted effect on the events of that time. How much so, is one of many fields explored in the novel.
From her first meeting with two anonymous men, the book leaves no doubt regarding the reality of her abilities in esoteric matters. The limitations in her talents, though, provide a source of suspense and frustration for the reader throughout.
Ooh, I like the sound of this one. 🙂
LikeLike
It offers much to like!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed! (In deed? Is there a deed involved? What kind of deed? Err… nevermind!) Have a nice Sunday! 😀
LikeLike
Pingback: Well-composed portraits, rushed edits, and Bella Italia | Colonialist's Blog
Col, how do you find the time for all of this? Writing, poetry, editing, composing,family man, horseman, cat lover….I’m dizzy just contemplating it all! Lovely to hear about Mart’s book – sounds as if it is a must-read!
LikeLike
Not to mention, now, house demolition … er, reconfiguration … overseer!
The book is one to suffer damage from over-eager turning of pages, indeed! And talk about not finding time – how HE does it, I don’t know. Gives a concert, records some TV episodes, and then writes 4000 words or so …
LikeLike
I seem to recall you got a ”nod” in something I wrote
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
For which I was duly grateful!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Editors are worth their weight in gold and I always acknowledge them in my books. I didn’t know it was “cool” for them to write reviews of books they have edited, though. Conflict of interest and all of that. Interesting! 🙂
LikeLike
I have also been inclined to avoid doing so because of that perceived conflict, but when one thinks about it an editor, with an intimate ‘outside’ view of the work, is one of the best qualified to write a review. This, only provided it is clear to the author that it will be done honestly, objectively and without bias. Unless that is accepted, the editor should abstain – and, of course, should not expect payment for such writing or there certainly would be a conflict. A blurb or a synopsis is a different matter.
As with all reviews, if it is favourable the author will use it, but if scathing will stick it in a cupboard and pretend it didn’t happen.
LikeLike
I agree, put those scathing reviews in the cupboard! But I don’t think I could ever pretend as if they never happened. They would nag at me, much like the “Tell Tale Heart” Poe wrote of… 😉
LikeLike
I think every celebrated writer without exception has had many reviewers who hated the book/s. JK Rowling, for example, probably listens to hers for a good laugh on her way to the bank.
LikeLike
🙂
LikeLike
Maybe you should edit my blog posts before I publish them. I see nowadays that there are more and more errors popping up…
LikeLike
Blog posts don’t have to be perfect!
LikeLike
I agree the editor is very important. They pin point so much and are really the first people to tell you if you have a winner or not 🙂
well done to you on your hard work
LikeLike
Thanks! Of course, some editors are crusty old curmudgeons who will tell you that ‘Gone with the Wind’ won’t even depart in a hurricane. 🙂
LikeLike
Glad you posted this here. You must have smiled over his appraisal. All your hard work came together.
LikeLike
I do think Mart was pleased at my appraisal of his book, and that he has appreciated the effort I put in during my edit to research the background thoroughly.
LikeLike
Follow my Blog? I do reviews on Rock n Roll Autobiographies and True Crime Books
therealrene.wordpress.com
LikeLike
Neither is my writing (or composing) genre, sadly.
LikeLike